Thursday, December 18, 2014

Consensus Science = B.S.

The Great Global Warming Swindle
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 Musings from the Chiefio

 ..... it occurred to me that AGW (Human Caused Warming) might not be the first nor even the most important manipulated and totally fake “issue” that sucked buckets of money out of Joe and Jane Public and might have been preceded by many other similar frauds.

So what other “issues” might be of the same ilk?
I’d suggest starting with anything that has a UN signature on it.

    :) That and 'the US suspects', especially from the State Department as a pretext for dishonouring deposits in US dollars and more...'sanctions' the act of economic warfare with an analogy in attacks of deposits of private individuals ;  the UK, France and others play the same game...as do 'think tanks' and more.

About E.M.Smith

A technical managerial sort interested in things from Stonehenge to computer science. My present "hot buttons' are the mythology of Climate Change and ancient metrology; but things change...
This entry was posted in AGW Science and Background, Political Current Events and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

 

10 Responses to IF AGW is exposed as a “Jump the Shark” graft; what was the prior sub rosa?

  1. stefanthedenier says:
    17 December 2014 at 2:56 am
    as the precursor for the phony global warming, In the 70’s was: ”because of the CO2 dimming effect – by year 2000, will be an ice age” They were the first carbon molesters: here are the real proofs: https://globalwarmingdenier.wordpress.com/2014/12/06/genesis-of-the-warmist-cult/
  2. omanuel says:
    17 December 2014 at 4:21 am
    You are on the right track. Outright lies disguised as “Standard Models” & “consensus science” were inserted in textbooks of astronomy, nuclear and solar physics and cosmology soon after the United Nations was formed in Oct 1945 – about the same time George Orwell moved from London to the Scottish Isle of Jura to start writing “Nineteen Eighty-Four.”
    FEAR of nuclear annihilation in Aug-Sept 1945 apparently convinced world leaders to:
    1. Unite the Nations in Oct 1945
    2. Pay scientists public funds to hide the energy that destroyed Hiroshima
    3. Falsify textbooks of nuclear and solar physics and cosmology
    4. Scare the public with exaggerated claims about radiation dangers
    See: Galen Winson’s video:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ejCQrOTE-XA&feature=player_embedded
  3. adrianvance says:
    17 December 2014 at 4:32 am
    There have been many such hoaxes for money. AGW is just the most recent and it has cost us a trillion Dollars in outright costs, lost production, wasted money on bad technology, destruction of science education, new taxes, graft and corruption. And, it is not over by any means. It will die fighting. The demonization of DDT, CFCs, “Man in Space,” the wars in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan were all for money for flag-waving “defense” contractors. Dick Cheney was never off the Halliburton payroll the whole time he was VP. They were caught overbilling $116 million and paid a fine of $16 million, keeping the difference. Corruption is the real problem. It gave us 1929 and 2008 for openers. There is much, much more….
    Google “Two Minute Conservative” for facts, ideas and more.
  4. Don Matias says:
    17 December 2014 at 4:34 am
    Remember Germany’s “Waldsterben”? “Bodensterben” (death of the fertile topsoil) did not catch on but more recently “Feinstaub” (airborne dust) did → cars with diesel engines VERBOTEN in many German towns and cities. Acid rain, too much ozone in the countryside’s air. But people stubbornly insist on getting older and older – and no social engineering prevents them from doing so. It’s a shame.
  5. omanuel says:
    17 December 2014 at 5:02 am
    The entire course of world history was changed, and mankind enslaved by:
    1. A promise and a warning in the last paragraph of Aston’s 1922 Nobel Lecture
    2. Unreported CHAOS and FEAR of nuclear annihilation in Aug-Sept 1945
    3. Formation of the United Nations in Oct 1945 to save the world by hiding nuclear energy from the public
    See: Aston’s Promise & Warning (12 Dec 1922); CHAOS & FEAR (Aug 1945)
    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf
  6. Sandy McClintock says:
    17 December 2014 at 5:03 am
    Yes, Adrianvance, I too think the adverse effects of DDT were blown out of proportion. DDT has been quietly reintroduced because of its benefits in controlling insects that spread Malaria.
    Y2K: I was assured by the Y2K team that tractors would fail to start because their engine computers were not Y2K compliant!!
    Tamiflu: Are any readers experts on the efficacy of Tamiflu? My sources say, unofficially, its about as useful as two Paracetamol tablets. By coincidence, Paracetamol is reputed to have no more impact than ‘placebo effects’ !! In other words, those governments around the world which have spent big-time stockpiling Tamiflu, could have saved their money.
  7. omanuel says:
    17 December 2014 at 5:16 am
    Others are realizing that truth and freedom are closely connected:
    1. “The truth will set you free”
    http://suyts.wordpress.com/2014/12/15/the-truth-will-set-you-free-why-i-will-not-support-the-hoodiehands-upi-cant-breath-lunatics-protesting-its-a-bunch-of-lies/
    2. “How Today’s Top Scientists are gambling away scientific credibility”
    http://www.thehiggsfake.com/bankruptingphysics.html
    3. “Modern science is corrupted”
    http://tgrule.com/2014/12/16/science-is-being-corrupted-by-political-bias/
  8. power grab says:
    17 December 2014 at 5:50 am
    I have to submit the cholesterol myth. Ancel Keys’ work during WWII involved finding out what happened to the human body during starvation. His 7 countries study used only cherry-picked countries to put forth the idea that consuming cholesterol was the cause of heart disease. That project was undoubtedly hand-in-glove with the PTB behind the creation of the UN. Now we have a huge medical-industrial complex that successfully dupes people into taking cholesterol-loweringdrugs, supposedly to prevent death from heart attacks. In reality, people with low cholesterol are more likely to die earlier from things like cancer, suicide, or violent death. AIDS patients naturally have the low levels of cholesterol that the latest standards recommend. You know how healthy those people are, right?
  9. Another Ian says:
    17 December 2014 at 6:08 am
    E.M.
    Ever read “Desertification: Exploding the Myth” by D.S.G. Thomas and N.J. Middleton (1994). Wiley?
    “Epilogue
    We started this book with a prologue (page xiii) proposing four parts to the desertification myth. In the preceding pages we have attempted to break down and analyse desertification into terms of how it has been commonly presented, how it has been turned into a global problem and how science and social science researchers and commentators have attempted to disentangle fact from fiction. We now return to the myth and summarise the evidence that leads us to confirm its four main parts.
    1. According to United Nations data, desertification affects one third of the world land area. It is a voracious process which rapidly degrades productive land, especially in drylands
    The bases for such data are at best inaccurate and at worst centred on nothing better than guesswork. Estimates ot the global extent of desertification that may have been derived for guidance or as rough indicators became facts, almost carved in tablets of stone. These data have been widely used to publicise desertification and create a sell-perpetuating institutional myth. Problems of estimating the extent of soil-degradation over large areas or regions and problems of separating natural variations in environmental conditions from those due to human actions make even the most guarded calculations nothing more than estimates. The advancing desert concept may have been useful as a publicity tool but it is not one that represents the real nature of desertification processes. ii is however the myth that has commonly entered public and political imaginations.
    2. Drylands are fragile ecosystems that are highly susceptible to degradation and desertification
    Ecological studies are indicating that dryland ecosystems commonly experience dramatic changes in character and biomass in response to natural climatic fluctuations These changes are often reversible as the ecosystems appear to be well adapted to cope with and respond to disturbance, demonstrating good recovery characteristics. Vegetation changes alone caused by human actions do not in themselves necessarily constitute degradation and may well be easily confused with natural changes. These changes are relatively easily identified compared with changes in soil systems and have commonly been treated as desertification. Changes in dryland soil svstems can be harder to identify and are certainly harder to monitor, especially over large areas and using current satellite-based systems
    3 Desertification is a, if not the, primary cause of human suffering and misery in drylands
    Distinguishing the social outcomes of desertification and drought may be difficult. Drought and desertification together may have provided .convenient explanations for general social maladies that may be due to politicaI mismanagement and disadvantaging economic systems. People may cause desertification when traditional land-use systems are destroyed or pressurised, population pressure increases or developing nations have to participate in the world market economy.
    4. The United Nations is central to attempts to understand and solve the desertification problem
    The United Nations has played a major role in conceptualising desertification since 1977. It could be considered to have created desertification the institutional myth. It has been the source of publicity that has frequently had little reliable scientific foundation. The success of UN­-derived anti-desertification measures have yet to be reliably demonstrated and, in many eases, appear to have had little relevance to affected peoples Without the UN. desertification may not be as high on the environmental agenda as it is today.”
    Reads like “Desertification” was a UN prototype for CAGW.
    IMO.
  10. Graeme No.3 says:
    17 December 2014 at 7:24 am
    Scared to Death by Christopher BOOKER and Richard NORTH; from a UK perspective
    Aids
    The Great Salmonella Scare
    the Hygiene police
    Listeria Hysteria
    Mad Cows and Madder Politicians
    The Belgium Dioxins Debacle
    The Y2K Bug
    The Modern Witch Craze
    Speed Kills
    Unleaded Petrol
    Passive Smoking
    The Great Asbestos Scam
    Global Warming
    and to add to the score OrganoPhosphates are safe – non scare.
As for me : whether it was my login with WordPress ( which might well be a problem given my history of being bounced because of running a link farm...the most likely cause of their complaint I should expect ) or the peculiar setup of my new Asus VSK3000E desktop with customized deletion of standard malware and even lack of Abobe FlashPlayer...my comment hung.

Well? Say something!

Twitter picture
John Farnham (@opit): You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
I came to the AGW contestation via power politics...literally.I noticed the constant framing of Iran - like Iraq and even North Korea - as the 'real danger' due to their alleged noncompliance with the edicts of the verifying authority they created to show they were not making nuclear arms --- despite repeated 'suspicions' they were by the real horrors...the UN Security Council,,,nuclear armed nations all. See the NPT TRAP at Transcend Media. Nor was that all : built in disaster accompanied the GE nuclear submarine designs used to provide Turn Key power generation at Fukushima...and elsewhere as funded by the World Bank and IMF. YouTube expounds on warnings from design and construction engineers about locating a nuclear pile in an earthquake/tsunami zone.Iran's Nuclear Energy Program
Part V: From the United States Offering Iran Uranium Enrichment Technology to Suggestions for Creating Catastrophic Industrial Failure http://www.payvand.com/news/04/dec/1186.html
 A look at Jane Bergermeister's blog on birdflu started me on vaccine fraud. http://oldephartte.livejournal.com/tag/vaccinations  http://oldephartte.livejournal.com/tag/vaccines  Desertification is a little more subtle. As per Easter Island, it is a characteristic of a civilization in decline to denude land of trees...and in the Amazon that was shown to reduce rainfall and increase runoff. In short, environmental despoilation is a clusterf**k...and the worst is war. But big agriculture destroyed farming in Central and Soutj America in the 40's and 50's...courtesy of Nelson A. Rockerfeller...chief of the CIA. Between that and GMOs ( protesters at Hawaiian research centres are going through the roof ) a little lying to secure a stranglehold on strategic war materiel by depriving people of modern infrastructure might seem relatively innocuous.Since its origins, the IPCC has been open and explicit about seeking to generate a ‘scientific consensus’ around climate change and especially about the role of humans in climate change http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/18115/ 


Related articles

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)