Banned from climate crisis promotion thread

Global warming protest, Stockholm, Sweden. The sign says "Warning - climate chaos". (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Attribution of recent climate change (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

English: Climate zones of the world (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

English: See extending Description below (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

English: Animated global map of monthly long term mean surface air temperature (Mollweide projection). (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Took them long enough...and speaks volumes about the openness of 'debate.'

CONNECTING THE DOTS

Eight Pseudoscientific Climate Claims Debunked by Real Scientists

*SecularHumanist199  Gregg Braddoch • 4 days ago

OK, but climate scientists are the only ones whose opinions count on this issue. I am a scientist who publishes in the area of business analytics. I would be the first to admit that my perspective on the "truth" of climate science claims is irrelevant, since that it not an area that I study. On the other hand, what I have read from both sides makes a very compelling argument for the reality of anthropogenic climate change. Chemists, physicists, biologists, or any other scientists' opinions on climate change are irrelevant.

 

•

Reply

•

Share › 

SecularHumanist199 " Chemists, physicists, biologists, or any other scientists' opinions on climate change are irrelevant." That should make the great unwashed out here much more cheerful, as we see no proof that the analysis of the alleged climate change - and change is normal in a system of observed cyclical behaviour - meaning that there can be none according to your limitations of qualified overview. This should go a long way towards convincing those who only see too many limitations of data collection, historical records and timeline...not to mention simplistic nature of the basic assumptions in using static analysis to describe a dynamic chaotic system vastly dominated by water vapour and its effects of energy transport, albedo change, etc. ...that there is indeed a 'climate science'. ( Yes, that is satire. )

× We are unable to post your comment because you have been blocked by Moyers & Company. Find out more.

* "97% of all scientists believe in global warming" translates into irrelevant trivia in this opinion.

Related articles

• UN climate change: 1000 scientists say no
• Andrew C (✔): The Brainy Braininess Of Bobby Jindal - Esquire
• How 'scientific consensus' ended up with a bad reputation
• How To Use Annotations In Google Analytics [VIDEO]
• Rosamund Urwin: A formula for more MPs who know science
• The not-a-scientist dodge
• Politically Left Scientist Dissents – Calls Obama ‘delusional’ on global warming
• The problem with 'anthropogenic'
• More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
• The myth of the 97% climate change consensus