Vanunu revealed details of his detention by writing on his hand: "Vanunu M was hijacked in Rome. ITL. 30.9.86, 21:00. Came to Rome by fly BA504." (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
English: Yearbook picture of Donald Rumsfeld from Bric-a-Brac, 1954 edition. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Map of Iraq, where Yahya ibn Umar conducted his revolt (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
On 5 October 1986, the British newspaper The Sunday Times ran the story on its front page under the headline: "Revealed: the secrets of Israel's nuclear arsenal." (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
English: Mordechai Vanunu (Hebrew: מרדכי ואנונו, born in Marrakech, Morocco on 14 October 1954) is an Israeli former nuclear technician who revealed details of Israel's nuclear weapons program to the British press in 1986. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Secret Memo By Donald Rumsfeld Proves Iraq War Started On False Pretenses
Link
Wednesday February 20, 2013, 6:18 pm
There was an independent agency at work in Iraq, as there is
today in Iran and once was in North Korea : all signatories to a treaty
involving over 140 nations trying to work towards nonproliferation of
nuclear weapons and nuclear disarmament : especially in the Middle East.
It is a comparatively recent development for Israel to openly state it
has nuclear weapons. The case of a man jailed for openly saying so still
has him rotting in jail. How Mordecai Vanunu revealed Israel's nuclear
weapons secret
www.peaceheroes.com/MordecaiVanunu/mvanunubio2.htm
Now in prison, Mordechai Vanunu gave photos of Dimona Nuclear Facility
and interview to London Times detailing Israeli nuclear program. Website
contains ... Vanunu Confirms Israel's Global Thermonuclear Blackmail
rense.com/general88/vanu.htm
Folks, Mordechai Vanunu has spent 18 years in an Israeli jail for
telling Israeli nuclear secrets. He was lured to Rome by Israeli agents
and kidnapped and then ... The 'call for help' you heard from Iraq was
the call of self justification by a liar invading another country on the
most specious of made up pretext. But if you don't want to believe that
becausre of accounts listed in the website Leading to War, you might
consider another story I posted today...where a Get Out of Jail Free
card was issued to prevent operation of interenational law to which the
US is signatory....just like the NPT treaty.
http://www.care2.com/news/member/468457648/3534806 And the losses of
Iraqi lives were about 500,000 mostly women and children from the
effects of sanctions in the 10 years before the invasion....ostensibly
done because Saddam would not leave the country. Maybe he remembered
what happened to Norieaga. In any case, minimizing civilian casualties
is spo routine that the army does not count them....and complains
mightily about any attempt to do so.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html
http://www.war-stories.com/aspprotect/dn-poss-body-count-1965-2.asp
http://icasualties.org/
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2008/11/iraq-math-war
http://www.antiwar.com/casualties/ http://warvictims.wordpress.com/
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/casualty.pdf
http://dissidentvoice.org/deathtoll/
The Mother Jones article establishes body counts as a political
football. Just Foreign Policy used the Lancet study using standard
parameters for estimation. And however horrid the paranoid hoodlum put
into place in Iraq by the CIA to keep a lid on ethnic rivalries in a
powder keg might have been, nobody running Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo or
Bagram has a leg to strand on when talking about how cruel he was. Check
out the School of the Americas for context in who promotes torture.
Wednesday February 20, 2013, 6:29 pm
People who defend Obama give me a pain. He promised to
leave Iraq and reopen the killing in Afghanistan. From there we have
progressed to Libya and Syria with insurrections and NATO colour
revolutions in Iran and Egypt. Blowing a CIA NOC as done by Cheney's
office is another offense punishable by death - much chance of that. But
is going from bombers to drones which kill people in their homes
progress ? Or perhaps the use of helicopters which open fire on first
responders after machine gunning people in public assembly is
preferable. Nuts. It was always about the oil : energy wars.
Wednesday February 20, 2013, 9:26 pm
I read an analysis years ago about yellowcake not even being
suitable as feedstock for weapons - but was part of a manufacturing
process for fertilizer ! Scooter Libby went to jail for blowing the CIA
agent running WMD intel from Brewster Jennings...Valerie Plame/Wilson.
It was her husband who went to Nigeria.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_forgery
Thursday February 21, 2013, 7:04 am
My forgettery was kicking in. I was trying to recall who had
made the analysis about yellowcake years ago, saying it was an
absolutely stupid way to go about getting fissile material.. It was the
Arms Control Wonk, who also pointed out there was a great deal of
difference between reactor fuel at 3%, enrichment at 20% for nuclear
isotopes for medicine, and 95% enrichment to make something go Bang. The
technology gets tougher the higher the enrichment desired, and of
course yield goes down as well.
Anybody against war should take a look at CASMII and see the articles
against penalties,, etc. for Iran. The perfidity and propaganda
surrounding nuclear arms and power generation give a whole new meaning
to Liar. Here's one illustrating what has come out of strategic
analysis and covert war : http://www.payvand.com/news/04/dec/1186.html
What you can find out surfing YouTube is insane. It happens I was
recapping some old info and adding new material. Try not get get sick.
This stuff is revolting and outrageous : fit companion for the mentality
mocked by Peter Sellers in Sr. Strangelove : or, How I Learned to Stop
Worrying and Love the Bomb
http://oldephartte.blogspot.ca/p/blog-page.html
DrPaul1955
12
Murcurey wrote: 'Many many Afghans will just want to get
out & who on earth can blame them. The rest will just continue in
the same hell hole it has always been.' [My emphasis]
A
far too sweeping statement. About 10 years back I met an Afghan woman
doing a science PhD at Manchester University; I said to her, and she
agreed, that were she 10 years younger she'd probably have been married
off to some old bloke she'd never previously met, would have had to walk
around in a tent, and have had five kids before she was 20. There was a
time, not that long ago, when women in Kabul walked around in Western
clothes, went to school and into further education, and lived civilised
lives, all with official encouragement and support.
I also
recall, in the mid-1980s, seeing British government press packs,
distributed to the world media via UK embassies, showing fearsome,
bearded blokes in pancake hats, holding rocket launchers, and hailed as
brave freedom-fighters, as if they were some present-day version of the
French Resistance. It was these thugs, financed and armed by the British
and US governments, who besieged and finally overthrew the very
government that was attempting to move Afghanistan into the modern era,
that encouraged this woman whom I met to be educated and live a modern
life.
Whenever I hear British or US politicians rabbit on about
democracy or human rights in Afghanistan, I cannot but think of the vile
religious maniacs whom they sponsored, and the social retrogression
that has occurred in that country thanks to them.
Pindi
28
The invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq were neither morally nor legally justified, the UN did not sanction either invasion:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/did-9-11-justify-the-war-in-afghanistan/19891
The US had decided, already in 2001, to invade 7 countries, the pretext was to be supplied later:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha1rEhovONU&feature=related
The invasions of all ME countries is for resources and geopolitics, as recommended by Brezhinski and the PNAC.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/brzezinskigrandchessboard
Even high up US persons have admitted this, it has nothing to do with nation building:
Here is Alan Greenspan:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/sep/16/iraq.iraqtimeline
And here is Bolton:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFbpKKOEnAE&feature=feedf
The
rest of your post is also claptrap, the usual USA! USA! type of
rubbish. The US invaded Iraq and Afghanistan (and Libya and Syria, Iran,
etc) for resources and geopolitics, pure and simple.
Afghanistan Accuses U.S. Special Operations Troops of Murder, Abduction, and Torture
US Politics & Gov't
- - warincontext.org
The Afghan government barred elite
American forces from operating in a strategic province adjoining Kabul
on Sunday, citing complaints that Afghans working for American Special
Operations forces had tortured and killed villagers in the area.
Abducted Iranian diplomats in Israeli regime jails: Envoy
http://www.voanews.com/content/israeli-official-iranian-nuclear-expert-requests-asylum-in-israel-92043594/116452.html
http://www.english.moqawama.org/essaydetailsf.php?eid=9539&fid=19
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Irans_covert_war_with_Israel_in_Caspian_999.html
http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/07/irans-leadership-rational-about-nuclear-weapons-says-israels-military-chief/
Secret Memo By Donald Rumsfeld Proves Iraq War Started On False Pretenses
Link
Wednesday February 20, 2013, 6:18 pm
There was an independent agency at work in Iraq, as there is
today in Iran and once was in North Korea : all signatories to a treaty
involving over 140 nations trying to work towards nonproliferation of
nuclear weapons and nuclear disarmament : especially in the Middle East.
It is a comparatively recent development for Israel to openly state it
has nuclear weapons. The case of a man jailed for openly saying so still
has him rotting in jail. How Mordecai Vanunu revealed Israel's nuclear
weapons secret
www.peaceheroes.com/MordecaiVanunu/mvanunubio2.htm
Now in prison, Mordechai Vanunu gave photos of Dimona Nuclear Facility
and interview to London Times detailing Israeli nuclear program. Website
contains ... Vanunu Confirms Israel's Global Thermonuclear Blackmail
rense.com/general88/vanu.htm
Folks, Mordechai Vanunu has spent 18 years in an Israeli jail for
telling Israeli nuclear secrets. He was lured to Rome by Israeli agents
and kidnapped and then ... The 'call for help' you heard from Iraq was
the call of self justification by a liar invading another country on the
most specious of made up pretext. But if you don't want to believe that
becausre of accounts listed in the website Leading to War, you might
consider another story I posted today...where a Get Out of Jail Free
card was issued to prevent operation of interenational law to which the
US is signatory....just like the NPT treaty.
http://www.care2.com/news/member/468457648/3534806 And the losses of
Iraqi lives were about 500,000 mostly women and children from the
effects of sanctions in the 10 years before the invasion....ostensibly
done because Saddam would not leave the country. Maybe he remembered
what happened to Norieaga. In any case, minimizing civilian casualties
is spo routine that the army does not count them....and complains
mightily about any attempt to do so.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html
http://www.war-stories.com/aspprotect/dn-poss-body-count-1965-2.asp
http://icasualties.org/
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2008/11/iraq-math-war
http://www.antiwar.com/casualties/ http://warvictims.wordpress.com/
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/casualty.pdf
http://dissidentvoice.org/deathtoll/
The Mother Jones article establishes body counts as a political
football. Just Foreign Policy used the Lancet study using standard
parameters for estimation. And however horrid the paranoid hoodlum put
into place in Iraq by the CIA to keep a lid on ethnic rivalries in a
powder keg might have been, nobody running Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo or
Bagram has a leg to strand on when talking about how cruel he was. Check
out the School of the Americas for context in who promotes torture.
Wednesday February 20, 2013, 6:29 pm
People who defend Obama give me a pain. He promised to
leave Iraq and reopen the killing in Afghanistan. From there we have
progressed to Libya and Syria with insurrections and NATO colour
revolutions in Iran and Egypt. Blowing a CIA NOC as done by Cheney's
office is another offense punishable by death - much chance of that. But
is going from bombers to drones which kill people in their homes
progress ? Or perhaps the use of helicopters which open fire on first
responders after machine gunning people in public assembly is
preferable. Nuts. It was always about the oil : energy wars.
Wednesday February 20, 2013, 9:26 pm
I read an analysis years ago about yellowcake not even being
suitable as feedstock for weapons - but was part of a manufacturing
process for fertilizer ! Scooter Libby went to jail for blowing the CIA
agent running WMD intel from Brewster Jennings...Valerie Plame/Wilson.
It was her husband who went to Nigeria.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_forgery
Thursday February 21, 2013, 7:04 am
My forgettery was kicking in. I was trying to recall who had
made the analysis about yellowcake years ago, saying it was an
absolutely stupid way to go about getting fissile material.. It was the
Arms Control Wonk, who also pointed out there was a great deal of
difference between reactor fuel at 3%, enrichment at 20% for nuclear
isotopes for medicine, and 95% enrichment to make something go Bang. The
technology gets tougher the higher the enrichment desired, and of
course yield goes down as well.
Anybody against war should take a look at CASMII and see the articles
against penalties,, etc. for Iran. The perfidity and propaganda
surrounding nuclear arms and power generation give a whole new meaning
to Liar. Here's one illustrating what has come out of strategic
analysis and covert war : http://www.payvand.com/news/04/dec/1186.html
What you can find out surfing YouTube is insane. It happens I was
recapping some old info and adding new material. Try not get get sick.
This stuff is revolting and outrageous : fit companion for the mentality
mocked by Peter Sellers in Sr. Strangelove : or, How I Learned to Stop
Worrying and Love the Bomb
http://oldephartte.blogspot.ca/p/blog-page.html
12
Murcurey wrote: 'Many many Afghans will just want to get
out & who on earth can blame them. The rest will just continue in
the same hell hole it has always been.' [My emphasis]
A far too sweeping statement. About 10 years back I met an Afghan woman doing a science PhD at Manchester University; I said to her, and she agreed, that were she 10 years younger she'd probably have been married off to some old bloke she'd never previously met, would have had to walk around in a tent, and have had five kids before she was 20. There was a time, not that long ago, when women in Kabul walked around in Western clothes, went to school and into further education, and lived civilised lives, all with official encouragement and support.
I also recall, in the mid-1980s, seeing British government press packs, distributed to the world media via UK embassies, showing fearsome, bearded blokes in pancake hats, holding rocket launchers, and hailed as brave freedom-fighters, as if they were some present-day version of the French Resistance. It was these thugs, financed and armed by the British and US governments, who besieged and finally overthrew the very government that was attempting to move Afghanistan into the modern era, that encouraged this woman whom I met to be educated and live a modern life.
Whenever I hear British or US politicians rabbit on about democracy or human rights in Afghanistan, I cannot but think of the vile religious maniacs whom they sponsored, and the social retrogression that has occurred in that country thanks to them.
Pindi
A far too sweeping statement. About 10 years back I met an Afghan woman doing a science PhD at Manchester University; I said to her, and she agreed, that were she 10 years younger she'd probably have been married off to some old bloke she'd never previously met, would have had to walk around in a tent, and have had five kids before she was 20. There was a time, not that long ago, when women in Kabul walked around in Western clothes, went to school and into further education, and lived civilised lives, all with official encouragement and support.
I also recall, in the mid-1980s, seeing British government press packs, distributed to the world media via UK embassies, showing fearsome, bearded blokes in pancake hats, holding rocket launchers, and hailed as brave freedom-fighters, as if they were some present-day version of the French Resistance. It was these thugs, financed and armed by the British and US governments, who besieged and finally overthrew the very government that was attempting to move Afghanistan into the modern era, that encouraged this woman whom I met to be educated and live a modern life.
Whenever I hear British or US politicians rabbit on about democracy or human rights in Afghanistan, I cannot but think of the vile religious maniacs whom they sponsored, and the social retrogression that has occurred in that country thanks to them.
Pindi
28
The invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq were neither morally nor legally justified, the UN did not sanction either invasion:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/did-9-11-justify-the-war-in-afghanistan/19891
The US had decided, already in 2001, to invade 7 countries, the pretext was to be supplied later:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha1rEhovONU&feature=related
The invasions of all ME countries is for resources and geopolitics, as recommended by Brezhinski and the PNAC.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/brzezinskigrandchessboard
Even high up US persons have admitted this, it has nothing to do with nation building:
Here is Alan Greenspan:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/sep/16/iraq.iraqtimeline
And here is Bolton:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFbpKKOEnAE&feature=feedf
The rest of your post is also claptrap, the usual USA! USA! type of rubbish. The US invaded Iraq and Afghanistan (and Libya and Syria, Iran, etc) for resources and geopolitics, pure and simple.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/did-9-11-justify-the-war-in-afghanistan/19891
The US had decided, already in 2001, to invade 7 countries, the pretext was to be supplied later:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha1rEhovONU&feature=related
The invasions of all ME countries is for resources and geopolitics, as recommended by Brezhinski and the PNAC.
http://www.wanttoknow.info/brzezinskigrandchessboard
Even high up US persons have admitted this, it has nothing to do with nation building:
Here is Alan Greenspan:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/sep/16/iraq.iraqtimeline
And here is Bolton:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFbpKKOEnAE&feature=feedf
The rest of your post is also claptrap, the usual USA! USA! type of rubbish. The US invaded Iraq and Afghanistan (and Libya and Syria, Iran, etc) for resources and geopolitics, pure and simple.
Afghanistan Accuses U.S. Special Operations Troops of Murder, Abduction, and Torture
US Politics & Gov't
- - warincontext.org
US Politics & Gov't
- - warincontext.org
The Afghan government barred elite
American forces from operating in a strategic province adjoining Kabul
on Sunday, citing complaints that Afghans working for American Special
Operations forces had tortured and killed villagers in the area.
Abducted Iranian diplomats in Israeli regime jails: Envoy
http://www.voanews.com/content/israeli-official-iranian-nuclear-expert-requests-asylum-in-israel-92043594/116452.html
http://www.english.moqawama.org/essaydetailsf.php?eid=9539&fid=19
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Irans_covert_war_with_Israel_in_Caspian_999.html
http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/07/irans-leadership-rational-about-nuclear-weapons-says-israels-military-chief/
http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/07/irans-leadership-rational-about-nuclear-weapons-says-israels-military-chief/
No comments:
Post a Comment