Saturday, August 29, 2020

29 August - My Yahoo ! - 1 of 2


Sharyl Attkisson


BlackListed News


naked capitalism


NEPC - Blog Post of the Day


Energy


Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories


Politics



  • Top US general says military will not escort Donald Trump from the White House if election disputed

    America's most senior general has declared the military will not intervene if Donald Trump were to decline to leave the White House following a disputed US election. In a letter to Congress, Mark Milley, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he did not envisage soldiers playing any role if Republicans and Democrats did not agree on the result. Mr Trump has repeatedly voiced concerns that the election will be undermined by fraud during widespread mail-in voting amid the coronavirus pandemic, and suggested that the result may never be known. Joe Biden, the Democrat nominee, has said he fears Mr Trump will try to "steal" the election but the military would "escort him from the White House with great dispatch." Democrat congresswomen Elissa Slotkin and Mikie Sherrill wrote to the general seeking answers as to what the military's role would be. In a written response General Milley, known to be a student of military history, wrote: "I believe deeply in the principle of an apolitical US military. In the event of a dispute over some aspect of the elections, by law US courts and the US Congress are required to resolve any disputes, not the US military. "I foresee no role for the US armed forces in this process. We will not turn our backs on the Constitution of the United States." Ms Slotkin said: "These are just prudent questions to be asking given the things that the president has been saying publicly." She said the general's answers "demonstrated that the chairman recognised the military's role in our elections is to essentially stay out, that the military's role in the peaceful transition of power is to stay out." Last month, Mr Trump said it was too early to guarantee he would accept the election results. He said: "I have to see. Look, I have to see. No, I'm not going to just say yes. I'm not going to say no."
    The Telegraph
  • If the police officer who shot Jacob Blake can prove he feared an 'imminent risk of death or great bodily harm,' his shooting could be legally justified

    An officer shot Jacob Blake while he had his back turned toward them. If they reasonably feared for their lives, it may be legally justified.
    INSIDER
  • Unemployment: No Stimulus In Sight Means Republicans Could Pass Bill Without Democrats Containing $300 Boost

    The first step toward a possible compromise on a second round of federal stimulus money is in the works. But there's still a ways to go before the money starts flowing to the unemployed. A conversation Thursday between Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows produced no results, […]
    Deadline

Navajo Times


Ancient Code


DutchNews.nl


BleepingComputer


AboveTopSecret.com Top Topics


Accuracy In Academia


Al Jazeera English


AllThingsD » Walt Mossberg


altahrir, news of Islam, Muslims, Arab Spring and special Palestine


BBC News - Home


Bartholomew's Notes


Everything Matters


BlackListed News


Brave The World


Center on Budget: Comprehensive News Feed


Coyote Blog


Dandelion Salad


Fabius Maximus website


Inter Press Service

INTERNATIONALIST 360°

New Content on CO2 Science

MercoPress

National Wind Watch: Wind Energy News


www.thenewfederalist.eu

Big Picture News, Informed Analysis

Online Cancer Blog

lborkowski

Signs of the Times

Stuff.co.nz - Stuff


Freethought Blogs

No comments: